Social Studies Middle School Guide
Four Quadrants / Voting Chips (Constructing Explanations, Argumentation, or Group Modeling) What & How: Print four slightly different models, explanations, or hypotheses. Provide each table with four BINGO chips, beans, or plastic markers. 1. Have a student from each small group or table read the four statements aloud and place the paper with the statements on it in the middle of the table. 2. Going in turn, have each student state which of the four statements they most agree with and why, with no interruptions. 3. When the speaker is finished, he or she places a BINGO chip on the statement they most agree with. 4. Going in turn, each of the other three team members states their beliefs and places a BINGO chip. 5. As a whole room, tally how many chips there are for each statement and ask students to clarify their thinking to each other.
Example:
Which of these models best explains how you think students learn language?
Why: ●
This activity is recommended for eliciting student argumentation from evidence or experience, and revising ideas. It is a good way for students to attempt to explain what they have seen in a demonstration or how it relates to the anchoring phenomenon. ● You could use talk moves to ask students to elaborate and clarify their thinking. ● If needed, each student can write his or her ideas at the end of class in their science journal. Source: STEMteachingtools.org/brief/35
Discussion Diamond (Developing Consensus)
What & How: Each small group or table needs a graphic organizer that looks like the image to the right. This could be on a poster or whiteboard. 1. The teacher poses an open-ended question. 2. Each student will write on one of the triangular “corners” of the organizer. Students get a designated amount of time (e.g., 3 minutes) to think and write their thoughts in their corner. 3. The students take turns explaining their ideas to each other (all students must share). 4. The students discuss what their consensus view might be and write their consensus view in the middle.
Why: ● This activity is recommended for eliciting student argumentation from evidence or experience, and reaching consensus. ● This makes a good formative assessment artifact.
This collection has been curated by GUHSD Science. Sources include SDAIE, San Francisco Unified School District’s Multilingua l Pathways Department, STEM Teaching Tools, Ambitious Science Teaching, and New Visions Curriculum Resources.
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker